1. How has the landscape of Romans scholarship changed since your first edition?
Many more commentaries and monographs and articles have been written on Romans since 1998. Plus, the apocalyptic view of Paul has become more popular, and the post-new perspective apocalyptic view of Doug Campbell.
2. In what ways has your understanding of Romans developed or become more nuanced?
I have nuanced my view towards the new perspective, showing where it sees things rightly. The inclusion of the Gentiles was a major issue for Paul and the new perspective sees that correctly. I have made hundreds of small changes in the commentary as well, which reflect, I hope, a more mature reading that the first edition.
3. In the preface to your commentary you write that you’ve changed your interpretation of a few key passages. Aside from those, did anything strike you in a new way when you returned to Romans?
Nothing that stands out. Romans always challenges, provokes, and encourages. I made many minor changes, but apart from what I said in the preface the 2nd edition remains the fundamentally the same. Still, the changes noted in the preface are quite significant!
4. As you reconsidered Romans, what aspect of the letter has been most influential to you?
That is a hard question to answer. I am not sure any particular theme stands out. I suppose I was struck, if my reading of the last part of Romans 7 is correct, that we still struggle with sin, despite the remarkable changes in our lives, until the day of redemption.
5. You’ve been teaching and writing for almost forty years. Which scholars have been most influential to you?
I take it that you are talking about Romans. I would say over the years: John Murray, Cranfield, Moo, and more recently John Barclay.
6. Are there any scholars breaking new ground in Romans or in Pauline studies? (—a very broad question, I know)
I would say that John Barclay’s Paul and the Gift is a ground-breaking book. He helps us understand grace in terms of the cultural context in which Paul wrote, and he qualifies the understanding of grace proposed by E. P. Sanders in Paul and Palestinian Judaism.
7. Lastly, are there any books you are working on now?
I am revising my book on the Apostle Paul and my commentary on 1-2 Peter and Jude.
Explore Schreiner’s Commentary..
- My Review of Schreiner’s Romans Commentary
- A Scholar’s Devotion with Tom Schreiner
- Interview with Tom Schreiner on Romans
- Three Troubles in Romans 2
- What is the ‘Righteousness of God’?